All AI applications

Finance & Accounting

Naming Convention Extractor & Analyzer

The Naming Convention Extractor is an AI-powered tool that transforms raw, inconsistent campaign names into clean, structured, dashboard-ready data — without requiring any changes at the source.…

The challenge

Why it exists

Advertising teams run campaigns across multiple platforms — Meta, Google Ads, TikTok, LinkedIn, and others. Each campaign, media buy, and creative is given a name that encodes critical metadata such as geography, objective, audience, format, and date. These naming conventions are meant to be structured, but in practice they break down fast. The core problem is threefold: 1. No enforcement at the point of entry Ad platforms like Meta Ads Manager and Google Ads have no built-in validation for campaign names. Anyone on the team can name a campaign anything — and they do. The result is that the same campaign type gets named IN_BAW_NewUsers_2025, india-brand-awareness-nwusr-25, 2025|India|BAW|NU, and Meta_India_BrandAwareness all within the same account. 2. Reporting tools can't handle inconsistency Tools like Datorama, Tableau, Power BI, and Looker all rely on pattern-matching or regex to extract dimensions from campaign names. These rules are rigid — they expect a fixed delimiter, a fixed position, and a fixed format. The moment someone deviates, the rule fails silently and the dimension shows as blank or incorrect. You end up with 11 versions of "India" in your Geo filter and no way to aggregate them reliably. 3. The cost is invisible but significant Bad naming doesn't throw an error. It just quietly corrupts your reports. Performance by audience becomes unreliable. Spend by objective is understated. Creative analysis is impossible. Budget pacing across geos is wrong. Decisions get made on data that looks clean but isn't — and no one knows until someone manually audits row by row, which can take days. What was missing: A tool that can read campaign names as they actually are — messy, inconsistent, abbreviated — and intelligently extract, standardize, and validate the dimensions within them without requiring the data to be clean first

The approach

How it works

The Naming Convention Extractor is an AI-powered tool that transforms raw, inconsistent campaign names into clean, structured, dashboard-ready data — without requiring any changes at the source. Users upload a CSV or Excel export from any ad platform. The tool then runs a multi-stage AI pipeline: it auto-detects or accepts a user-defined naming convention, intelligently extracts sub-values from each campaign name, expanding abbreviations, resolving inconsistencies, and standardising formats regardless of delimiters or ordering, then evaluates every row and flags exactly what is wrong and why. Unlike Datorama, Tableau, or Power BI which all require consistent naming before they can extract anything, this tool starts with the mess and produces the structure. The output is a fully enriched table with clean extracted dimensions, standardised name variants, and per-row quality evaluations exportable directly into any BI tool. Saved patterns make recurring audits take seconds, not hours.

Key capabilities

What it does

The Naming Convention Extractor is an AI-powered tool that transforms raw, inconsistent campaign names into clean, structured, dashboard-ready data — without requiring any changes at the source.

Users upload a CSV or Excel export from any ad platform.

Unlike Datorama, Tableau, or Power BI which all require consistent naming before they can extract anything, this tool starts with the mess and produces the structure.

The output is a fully enriched table with clean extracted dimensions, standardised name variants, and per-row quality evaluations exportable directly into any BI tool.

Typically used by

Organizations, Analysts

Business impact

saving of 150–300 hours per analyst per year — time that moves from repetitive data cleaning into actual analysis and decision making

Time saved Campaign name audits are currently done manually — an analyst goes through exported CSVs row by row, tries to parse what each segment means, and maps values into a separate sheet. For a dataset of 50–100 campaigns across 4–5 platforms, this takes anywhere from 3 to 6 hours per audit cycle. With this tool, the same audit takes under 2 minutes. For teams running weekly or bi-weekly reporting cycles, that is a saving of 150–300 hours per analyst per year — time that moves from repetitive data cleaning into actual analysis and decision making. Data quality improved Bad campaign naming doesn't throw an error — it silently corrupts reports. Geo dimensions show 11 versions of India. Audience segments are unaggregateable. Objective-level spend is wrong. Decisions on budget allocation, creative performance, and audience strategy are being made on data that looks clean but isn't. This tool eliminates that. Every extracted dimension is clean, consistently formatted, and validated — meaning dashboards built on top of this data are reliable for the first time without a manual cleaning step upstream. Reporting consistency across teams Different teams and agencies name campaigns differently. There is currently no way to standardise retroactively without this kind of tool. With saved extraction patterns, the same convention logic can be applied consistently across all historical data and all future exports — creating a single source of truth regardless of how messy the source names are. Unlocks analyses that weren't previously possible Because dimensions like audience, objective, geo, and format were buried inconsistently in campaign names, certain analyses simply couldn't be done reliably: Which audience segment has the best CTR across all platforms? How does spend split by objective compare to plan? Which creative format drives the most efficient CPM in each geo? All of these are now answerable from clean extracted data — retroactively, across all historical campaigns, without re-trafficking a single campaign. Scalability The tool processes up to 60 rows per API call and batches automatically, meaning it scales to thousands of campaigns with no additional effort. What works for a 50-row audit works identically for a 5,000-row annual data pull.

Built with

Technology

Tools & Frameworks

claude sonnet 4React 18JavaScript

Integrations

Anthropic Claude API

Want something like this for your team?

We'll map your workflow and scope a working prototype — typically in three weeks, not three months.

Talk to us